California has long prided itself on being an energy pioneer, pushing aggressive climate policies while maintaining one of the world's largest economies. But now, the state's relentless regulatory crackdown on refineries is backfiring—threatening not just skyrocketing gas prices but also military readiness and national security.
The problem stems from California's geographic isolation. With no oil pipelines crossing the Sierra Nevada, the state cannot draw on fuel infrastructure from the rest of the country. Its six remaining refineries—down from eight just a few years ago—bear sole responsibility for meeting enormous in-state demand: fuel for 30 million vehicles, nine international airports, 30 military bases, and three of the nation's busiest shipping ports.
In the past two years alone, California has lost 17% of its refining capacity with the closures of the Phillips 66 refinery in Wilmington (139,000 barrels per day) and the Valero refinery in Benicia (145,000–170,000 barrels per day). More closures are likely as the California Air Resources Board (CARB) tightens emissions rules, making it nearly impossible for refineries to operate profitably.
"These refineries make jet fuel and diesel and gasoline for our military," warned Rep. Vince Fong (R-Bakersfield). "If China or Russia decides to pull the plug on India getting crude for us, guess what? It's catastrophic," said Assemblymember Stan Ellis (R-Bakersfield).
Right now, California already imports 20% of its refined fuel from India, a country that buys much of its crude from Russia. If geopolitical tensions escalate, those supply lines could vanish overnight, leaving California's military bases, airports, and shipping ports stranded without fuel.
Experts predict gas prices could double or triple as refining capacity shrinks. A recent study found Californians already pay $2 more per gallon than drivers in Oklahoma, the state with the cheapest gas. But if imports become unreliable, prices could soar to $10–$12 per gallon, crippling families and businesses alike.
"Their backup plan is to continue to source it from places like India," said petroleum expert Mike Ariza, who co-authored a report on California's energy outlook. "India buys their crude oil from Russia, so effectively gasoline and jet fuel… that we could be producing here."
The Governor's office dismisses these concerns, claiming "no credible concerns" exist about future fuel supply for the military. But energy policy expert Ronald Stein disagrees, arguing that the environmental logic behind California's policies may actually be counterproductive on a global scale. By shrinking in-state refining and relying on longer international supply chains, the state could be raising overall carbon emissions while simultaneously deepening its dependence on foreign fuel sources.
Global oil markets are already under strain, with Iranian actions in the Strait of Hormuz disrupting nearly 20% of the world's oil supply. If foreign refineries face shortages, California—now dependent on imports—could be left scrambling.
"Every lost domestic barrel erodes surge capacity for military logistics," wrote analyst Danielle Walker. "This is not abstract policy—it is national security."
Wind turbines and solar panels generate electricity, but they can't produce the jet fuel, diesel, and gasoline that planes, ships, and trucks need to keep the world's 4th-largest economy moving — and that means refineries aren't optional.
Yet instead of building new ones, California is driving refineries out of state with punitive regulations. The result? Higher prices, fuel shortages, and a weakened military.
The warnings are clear: California's refinery collapse is a national security threat. If the state doesn't reverse course, it will soon be held hostage by foreign oil, leaving its military, economy, and families at risk.
Sources for this article include: