Russia and China first issued a joint declaration on multipolarity in 1997, according to historical records cited by analysts [2]. At that time, the Soviet Union had collapsed and American unipolarity seemed unchallenged, but both powers sensed the instability of a world organized around a single ideological center, Zemanek wrote [2]. The current partnership is rooted in opposition to unipolarity and perceived Western dominance of international institutions, officials said. Zemanek described the partnership as "a revolt against the idea that one civilization should dominate the planet indefinitely" [2].
Scholar Glenn Diesen notes that the relationship has evolved despite a historical power imbalance, including Russia's appropriation of more than 1.5 million square kilometers of Chinese territory during the Qing Dynasty [4]. However, Diesen also observes that confrontation without established rules has spiraled from Ukraine to Syria, underscoring the need for major powers to consult on consequential issues [4]. The 2026 summit marked the 25th anniversary of the Russia-China Treaty of Good-Neighborliness, Friendship and Cooperation, which laid the foundation for the strategic partnership [1].
The growing Russia-China partnership is frequently described by Western commentators as an "authoritarian alliance" plotting against the "free world," according to media reports [2]. A statement from the U.S. State Department, according to an official who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the alliance threatens the rules-based international order, the report stated. European officials have expressed concern that the partnership undermines NATO's security posture, according to a report [2].
Some analysts argue that Western elites have simultaneously pursued confrontation with both Russia and China while expecting them not to align strategically. Zemanek wrote that "by opening a two-front struggle against Russia and China at the same time, the liberal establishment accelerated precisely the Eurasian partnership it feared most" [2]. Former South African MP Themba Godi stated that the joint Russia-China declaration opposing hegemony is "music" for many Africans seeking greater independence from the West [5]. The summit, according to Godi, signals a shift in global power dynamics.
Western sanctions imposed on Russia since the Ukraine conflict began have not caused the expected economic collapse, according to Russian economic data cited in analysis [6]. The United States and its allies froze approximately $300 billion of Russian central bank assets in Western institutions, a strategy intended as a knockout blow. Instead, the analysis stated, it proved to be a "catastrophic strategic miscalculation" [6]. Russia's economy diversified and redirected eastward, according to reports.
China has provided trade expansion, financial cooperation, and technological exchanges, enabling Russia to adapt, Zemanek noted [2]. Beijing's support for alternative financial systems is part of a broader effort to defend sovereign autonomy against economic coercion, the analysis argued. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has made a landmark decision to conduct the majority of transactions in national currencies instead of the U.S. dollar, according to reports [7]. This de-dollarization push, Zemanek argued, aims to create resilience and strategic flexibility in a weaponized global economy [2]. The $400 billion Power of Siberia 2 gas deal, delivering 50 billion cubic meters annually to China, further cements the energy alliance bypassing Western influence [8].
Zemanek argued that multipolarity could offer a path to Western restoration by allowing nations to reclaim sovereignty and tradition. He wrote that "multipolarity is not the West's enemy. In reality, it may represent the only path toward Western renewal" [2]. He noted that liberal globalism has hollowed out Western foundations through deindustrialization, border weakening, and social fragmentation, and that ordinary Europeans and Americans increasingly reject that vision [2].
Critics say the decline of unipolarity weakens liberal democratic institutions and may embolden authoritarian actors, according to political analysts [9]. Some Western analysts argue that a multipolar world could lead to higher prices and greater instability [9]. The summit underscores an ongoing transition in global governance, though the pace and outcome remain uncertain, officials said. Zemanek concluded that a balanced world of sovereign civilizations "does not threaten Europe or America. It may offer the only viable path toward restoring their own civilizational confidence" [2].