Popular Articles
Today Week Month Year

HUGE: Powerhouse attorney Lin Wood files suit to declare entire Georgia election in 2020 null and void
By JD Heyes // Nov 16, 2020

Donald Trump is hanging on to his reelection chances by a thread after the thoroughly corrupt ‘mainstream media’ prematurely declared Democratic rival Joe Biden the ‘president-elect’ in what is clearly the latest coup attempt against a president who has done more good for our country than the last three presidents combined.


But because he is not a swamp rat and is a legitimate outsider, he is never going to be welcome in a government apparatus that has become so corrupt and so aloof from “We the People” that the ‘checks and balances’ enacted by our founders to prevent this sort of runaway situation are no longer functional.

As such, the people will have to come to the president’s aid and defend him as he fights to defend us and what remains of our republic and its election integrity.

One of those fighting the legal battle on behalf of the president and our country is powerhouse attorney Lin Wood.

A resident of Georgia, Wood is alleging in a massive lawsuit that a March 6, 2020 Consent Agreement made by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger (RINO) and other state officials with a sniveling Democrat lawyer associated with Hillary Clinton to change election and voting procedures in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Article II, which only gives that power to state legislatures.


The Gateway Pundit reported: 

On March 6, 2020 the Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, signed off on a secret legal agreement with the Democratic Party of Georgia, the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to alter absentee ballot procedures in Georgia. The Democrats’ attorney for this secret deal was Marc Elias from Perkins Coie, the consigliere of Hillary Clinton who has been busy managing other secretive Democratic election operations all across the country. 

“The validity of the results of the November 3, 2020 general election in Georgia are at stake as a result of Defendants’ unauthorized actions in the handling of absentee ballots within this state, actions that were contrary to the Georgia Election Code” Wood’s lawsuit states. 

“Defendants unilaterally, and without the approval or direction of the Georgia General Assembly, changed the process for handling absentee ballots in Georgia, including those cast in the general election. As a result, the inclusion and tabulation of absentee ballots for the general election (and potentially, for all future elections held within this state) is improper and must not be permitted. To allow otherwise would erode the sacred and basic rights of Georgia citizens under the United States Constitution to participate in and rely upon a free and fair election,” the lawsuit continues.

According to the Constitution Center, the primary authority to establish the “Times, Places, and Manner” of federal elections rests with state legislatures. That said, Congress also has authority to “make or alter” state regulations.

“The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators,” Article II, Sect. 4 of the Constitution states.

Nowhere in our founding document does it say state officials or state courts have a role in, or can arbitrarily change, voting and balloting procedures established by the legislature and signed into law by governors — whether there is a pandemic, civil war, an ongoing meteor shower, or an invasion by dinosaurs.

So, on the surface, Wood’s suit should be easily granted: The entire election in Georgia cannot be valid.

And if it's not, then what? A new election? There isn’t enough time, so that state’s GOP legislature will have to choose the electors (again, per the Constitution) for president, and frankly, after all of the Democratic underhandedness, those electors should choose President Trump.

Keep up with all of President Trump’s post-election legal challenges at Trump.news.

Sources include:




Take Action:
Support NewsTarget by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to NewsTarget.com (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.

NewsTarget.com © 2022 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
News Target uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.