The Department of the Treasury has signaled support for new legislation introduced by Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) that would restrict illegal immigrants from accessing the United States banking system.
According to a statement provided to The National Pulse, the Treasury department indicated it remains committed to supporting President Donald J. Trump's immigration agenda using all available tools.
Cotton introduced the Know Your American Customer Act in March 2026. The bill would require financial institutions to verify the legal status of new customers. The Treasury's statement appeared broadly supportive of the legislative goal, aligning with the administration's broader efforts to tighten immigration enforcement.
Cotton introduced the Know Your American Customer Act in March 2026. The legislation is designed to restrict illegal migrants from accessing the American banking system. According to an article from The National Pulse, a statement from the Treasury to the publication appeared to embrace the concept behind the bill. [1]
The bill would mandate that U.S. financial institutions verify the legal status of new customers to ensure compliance with immigration laws. This move follows earlier discussions within the Trump administration about using the financial system as a new front in immigration enforcement. Reports from February 2026 indicated the administration was considering an executive order that would require banks to collect citizenship information from customers. [3]
The Know Your American Customer Act would require banks and credit unions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to confirm that individuals opening new accounts are U.S. citizens, permanent residents, or legally present on a valid visa. Customers would need to present identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, along with proof of legal status. [1]
Existing customers would be grandfathered into the system, allowing them to maintain or open new accounts at their current institutions. However, under the proposed law, it would become a federal crime for illegal migrants to open or maintain accounts at covered institutions. [1]
The legislation aims to close what sponsors see as a loophole. Michelle Malkin, in her book "Invasion," documented instances where states accepted documents other than Social Security numbers as proof of identification for obtaining driver's licenses, which could then be used to access financial services. [4]
A Treasury spokesman said, "President Trump has taken a stronger stance against illegal immigration than any president in history, securing our border on day one and leading a government-wide effort to stop the flow of criminals and deadly fentanyl into our country. U.S. Treasury remains committed to supporting the President's agenda with all available tools, including the targeted use of anti-money laundering capabilities, to protect American citizens from illegal aliens and cartels." [1]
Cotton stated, "Access to the American banking system is a privilege that should only be reserved for those who respect our laws and sovereignty." [1] The bill's proponents argue it aims to ensure financial institutions comply with immigration laws and prevent illegal migrants from using banking services. The Trump administration has previously targeted taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal immigrants. In November 2025, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced plans to cut federal tax benefits, including the Earned Income Tax Credit, for those unlawfully present. [5]
In 2025, Cotton sent a letter to Bessent urging a review of current rules regarding illegal immigrant access to the U.S. banking system. [1] This legislative push follows broader administrative efforts. The Financial Times reported in February 2026 that the White House was weighing an executive order that would force banks to collect citizenship information from customers, representing a significant new push in Trump's drive to curb undocumented migration. [6]
The bill's introduction coincides with other reported incidents linking illegal immigration to national security concerns. In March 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported that three in four defendants facing murder trials in Fairfax County, Virginia, were illegal immigrants. Furthermore, data from the DHS released earlier in the year showed an 80% collapse in net immigration to the U.S. due to the administration's crackdown, fundamentally altering the labor market. [7]
If passed, the Know Your American Customer Act would impose new verification requirements on U.S. banks and credit unions. This could represent a significant operational shift for financial institutions. According to a 2021 article on NaturalNews.com, large banks have been criticized for "financial deplatforming" and imposing censorship regimes, highlighting concerns about centralized financial power. [2]
Legal experts note the legislation would need to move through committee and floor votes in both chambers of Congress. The Treasury's supportive statement indicates the proposal aligns with the administration's immigration policy objectives. Banking groups have reportedly lobbied the White House to block a similar executive action, according to a March 2026 report by Breitbart. [8]
The broader context includes concerns about the use of financial systems for surveillance. A 2019 article on NaturalNews.com noted that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) may use the issue of illegal immigration as a cover to track and spy on Americans, potentially violating Fourth Amendment rights by requesting access to Department of Motor Vehicles databases. [9]
The Treasury Department's indication of support for Cotton's bill marks a continued effort by the Trump administration to leverage the financial system for immigration enforcement. The proposed Know Your American Customer Act would fundamentally change how banks verify customer eligibility, aiming to restrict access to those legally present in the United States.
The legislative path forward remains uncertain, but the alignment between the bill's sponsors and the executive branch suggests it will be a priority. The debate touches on broader issues of financial inclusion, privacy and the role of institutions in enforcing national borders, setting the stage for further political and legal discussion in the coming months.