As wildfires continue to ravage Los Angeles County, Southern California Edison (SCE) finds itself at the center of a legal firestorm. Multiple lawsuits filed this week allege the utility company’s power lines sparked the devastating Eaton Fire, which has destroyed thousands of homes and claimed 24 lives. But while plaintiffs point fingers at Edison, critics argue the real culprits are California’s political leaders, who slashed firefighting budgets and prioritized diversity initiatives over emergency preparedness.
The lawsuits, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, claim SCE failed to de-energize power lines despite red flag warnings of extreme winds. Jeremy Gursey, an Altadena resident whose home was destroyed, is among the plaintiffs. His lawsuit cites photos and video evidence of a small blaze near an Edison transmission tower in Eaton Canyon, which quickly grew into an inferno. “The first fire in Pasadena and Altadena began as a small little blaze underneath that tower,” Marcus Errico, a local resident who captured the footage, told CNN.
SCE has denied responsibility, stating its equipment showed no electrical anomalies in the hours before the fire. However, the lawsuits allege the utility’s history of negligence—including its role in the 2017 Thomas Fire and 2018 Woolsey Fire—makes it a likely culprit.
While Edison faces scrutiny, critics argue the lawsuits should be directed at California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, whose budget cuts and policy priorities have left the state ill-prepared for wildfire season.
Newsom’s 2024 budget slashed $101 million from firefighting efforts, reducing funding to $2.6 billion—a drop in the bucket compared to the $14.7 billion he allocated for green energy initiatives. Critics say the governor’s focus on climate change policies, such as transitioning to electric vehicles, has come at the expense of practical fire prevention measures.
“FACT: California saw RECORD rainfall in 2023. They currently lack water because they refused to STORE it. It’s not climate change. It’s bad leadership by @GavinNewsom,” tweeted conservative commentator Vince Dao.
Meanwhile, Mayor Bass cut $17.6 million from the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) budget this year. Bass’s decision to prioritize homeless spending over fire preparedness has drawn sharp criticism, especially as the city battles its worst wildfires in history.
The LAFD has also faced backlash for its focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives over firefighting readiness. Deputy Chief Kristine Larson, who heads the department’s Equity and Human Resources Bureau, has come under fire for comments defending DEI hiring practices.
Critics argue the department’s emphasis on DEI has diverted resources from critical training and equipment. “People are dying and losing their homes, right now, because of people like this,” one social media user wrote in response to Larson’s comments.
As the fires rage on, the debate over accountability intensifies. While Edison may bear some responsibility, the broader failure lies with California’s leaders, who have consistently underfunded fire prevention and mismanaged resources.
“Incompetence in the limit is indistinguishable from sabotage,” Elon Musk tweeted, referring to Newsom and Bass. For the thousands of Angelenos who have lost everything, the time for accountability is now.
The wildfires have exposed a crisis of leadership in California—one that no lawsuit against Edison can fix. Until politicians prioritize preparedness over politics, the state will remain vulnerable to future disasters.
The lawsuits against Edison may dominate headlines, but the real story is one of political mismanagement and misplaced priorities. As California grapples with the aftermath of its worst wildfires, the blame game continues. But for the residents who have lost homes, livelihoods, and loved ones, the question remains: When will leaders step up to prevent the next disaster?
Sources for this article include: