Speaking from the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow, Kirill framed Russia as a bulwark against what he described as the West’s abandonment of faith and moral principles, positioning the nation as a spiritual counterweight to Western secularism.
The patriarch’s remarks come amid a broader cultural and political campaign by the Russian government to position itself as a defender of traditional values, in stark contrast to what it portrays as the moral decay of Western societies.
Patriarch Kirill’s critique of the West focused heavily on the normalization of gender transitions, which he described as a violation of divine law. “What is happening there smells of apocalypse,” he said, referring to Western nations. “This is against God’s law, and it will never be accepted in Russia as long as we remain faithful to our millennia-old cultural and spiritual heritage.”
The patriarch’s remarks reflect a broader narrative within Russia that frames the country as a guardian of traditional Christian values. He contrasted Russia’s spiritual vitality with what he portrayed as the decline of faith in the West. “They are astonished that we are building churches – 400 in Moscow alone,” Kirill said.
“In the West, churches are being repurposed, in the best case into mosques, and in the worst case into entertainment venues.”
This rhetoric aligns with the Kremlin’s long-standing efforts to position Russia as a global leader in the defense of conservative values. In recent years, the Russian government has enacted a series of laws targeting LGBTQ+ rights, including a 2013 ban on “gay propaganda” and, more recently, sweeping restrictions on gender reassignment procedures.
In July 2023, Russia introduced legislation that effectively banned medical gender transitions, except in cases involving birth abnormalities. The law, which was framed as a measure to protect children from the “transgender industry,” prohibits individuals from changing their gender on official documents and outlaws most medical interventions related to gender reassignment.
The crackdown was further solidified in November 2023, when President Vladimir Putin signed a decree banning the adoption of Russian children by individuals from countries that permit gender reassignment procedures. Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of Russia’s State Duma, defended the move, stating that it was necessary to shield children from “destructive” Western influences.
“Policies in some Western nations that allow minors to undergo gender reassignment are harmful to children’s well-being,” Volodin said. “We cannot allow our children to be exposed to such practices.”
The legislation has drawn sharp criticism from human rights organizations, which argue that it violates the rights of transgender individuals and exacerbates discrimination. However, within Russia, the measures have been widely supported by conservative and religious groups, who view them as a necessary defense of traditional values.
The demand for gender-affirming care has skyrocketed over the past decade, driven by aggressive advocacy, societal pressure, and the expansion of insurance coverage. In 2020, an estimated 13,000 to 15,000 gender-affirming surgeries were performed annually in the U.S. This number has likely surged in recent years, fueled by aggressive marketing, uncritical media promotion, and expanded insurance coverage.
Perhaps the most alarming trend is the sharp rise in young people identifying as transgender and being fast-tracked into gender-affirming care. A 2022 study estimated that 1.4% of U.S. youth aged 13–17 identify as transgender, with a growing number being prescribed puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or even undergoing irreversible surgeries. This reckless approach to pediatric care, often justified under the guise of "affirmation," ignores the high rates of desistance among youth and the lifelong consequences of these interventions. Critics argue that this practice preys on vulnerable adolescents, many of whom are struggling with underlying mental health issues or social contagion.
This trend raises serious concerns about the medicalization of identity and the exploitation of individuals, particularly youth, who are often ill-equipped to make life-altering decisions. The lack of long-term studies on the outcomes of these interventions, coupled with the silencing of dissenting voices, paints a troubling picture of an industry prioritizing ideology over science and profit over patient care.
In a world increasingly defined by cultural and ideological divides, Russia’s stance serves as a stark reminder of the enduring power of tradition and moral absolutes – and the lengths to which some nations will go to preserve these values.
Sources include: