As Election Day inches closer, the topic of immigration is on many Americans’ minds, especially considering how much worse it will become if Kamala Harris takes office.
This prospect was recently a topic of discussion for Alex Jones, who said that if Democrats do hold onto their power, much like in Europe, “our countries will be giant open-air migrant camps; they basically already are.”
He also drew attention to a 2000 UN strategy document entitled “Replacement Migration: Is it A solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” that he has been reporting on throughout the years, even though it’s a topic that often gets people banned on social media. His own effort to draw attention to it in 2018 was censored, which is interesting when you consider the fact that the documents are available online on the UN’s own website.
The report, which was published by the UN’s Population Division, looks into potential “replacement migration” scenarios in countries around the world that can help them counteract low fertility rates and maintain their population size. By importing workers from other countries to replace those who drop out of the workforce because of retirement, the theory goes, nations can keep their population size and age structure stable.
The report predicted population drops for Japan and most of Europe by 2050, with places like Italy and Estonia potentially losing as much as a third of their population.
They also explored how much immigration would be needed to maintain the current population sizes, and for some places, the figure is staggering. South Korea, which has been struggling with a worryingly low birth rate, would need 5.1 billion immigrants to keep its ratio of working age population at 1995 levels, according to the report. This is almost equivalent to the world's entire population and is completely unfeasible for such a small country – not to mention how it would make South Koreans a minority in their own country.
It's a similar story for American and Europe, who it says will need to be flooded with hundreds of millions of migrants by 2050 to maintain population levels.
The report claims: “In order to keep the potential support ratio constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year. By 2050, out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion, 775 million, or 73 per cent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.”
In other words, the UN thinks we need 600 million immigrants to flood into the U.S. by 2050 – and if Democrats have their way, we might find ourselves on our way there.
Meanwhile, the report says that at least 159 million migrant workers will be needed in Europe by 2025 to keep its current age balance, but the longer-term view is even more concerning: “Under the worst-case scenario, 1.4 billion migrants would be needed by 2050, an average of 25.2 million a year. This means that by 2050, Europe’s population would be 2.3 billion, of which 1.7 billion, almost three-quarters, would be migrants or their descendants.”
UN’s plan would devastate America and Europe
Given how things are going right now in Europe and the U.S. with migrants, this type of influx would be absolutely devastating. In the last few years, more than 2 million migrants have entered the European continent, and many of them are living on the government’s dime rather than contributing to society. Crime in many places is growing out of hand, with longtime residents finding their previously safe neighborhoods taking a scary downturn.
One person who won’t cave to the UN’s ridiculous demands is former president Donald Trump, who recently announced: “When I win on November 5, the migrant invasion ends and the restoration of our country begins.”
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.