The Vermont Supreme Court (VTSC) has ruled that the parents of a six-year-old boy cannot sue a school after the child was illegally injected with a Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.
In its July 26 decision, the highest court of the Green Mountain State rejected the lawsuit filed by the parents of six-year-old L.P. against the Windham Southeast School District (WSESD). This is because state officials, including officials in the public school system, are protected from liability under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005.
The PREP Act signed into law by former President George W. Bush ensures certain "covered persons" are immune from claims causally related to the use of a "covered countermeasure" during a public health emergency. A vaccine is considered a covered countermeasure under this law.
"To avoid dismissal on immunity grounds, plaintiffs would have had to present well-pleaded allegations showing that (1) at least one defendant was not a covered person, (2) some conduct by a defendant was not causally related to administering a covered countermeasure, (3) the substance injected into L.P. was not a covered countermeasure, or (4) there was no PREP Act declaration in effect at the time L.P. was injected," the ruling read. (Related: PREP Act passed in 2020 was designed to protect everyone EXCEPT those injured by vaccines.)
According to FOX 26, L.P. was injected with the COVID-19 vaccine during the November 2021 clinic hosted by the WSESD and the Vermont Department of Health. L.P.'s father told school officials days before the clinic that his son was not to be vaccinated. Despite the school acknowledging the directive, the six-year-old child was given one dose of Pfizer's mRNA COVID-19 vaccine after erroneously given the name tag of a child with no such restriction.
School officials apologized to the child's parents
It was only later that school officials eventually realized the error and called L.P.'s parents to apologize. But this failed to assuage the boy's parents, who later removed their child from the WSESD school.
"Thankfully, we are not aware of any harm to the student because of this mistake," WSESD Superintendent Mark Speno said in a 2021 apology letter. "We take our responsibilities to students and families very seriously, and we respect parents’ rights to make health care decisions for their children."
L.P.'s parents eventually took the school district to court, but the high court ruled in favor of the defendants, citing the PREP Act. The VTSC's ruling affirms an earlier decision by a state superior court in January of last year, LifeSiteNews reported.
"Near the beginning of the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, the Trump administration invoked the Act in declaring the virus a 'public health emergency,'" the pro-life news outlet stated. "A large body of evidence identifies significant risks to the COVID-19 vaccines, which were developed and reviewed in a fraction of the time vaccines usually take under former President Donald Trump’s Operation Warp Speed initiative."
Even the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention point out the injuries caused by the COVID-19 injections. Researchers from the public health agency have recognized a "high verification rate" of myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System following vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 injections. This led the researchers to conclude that "under-reporting is more likely" than over-reporting.
Watch this clip about the excess death of kids in America and the healthcare system.
This video is from The Prisoner channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
Young man suffers month-long debilitation and death after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
CDC, Facebook colluded to CENSOR COVID-19 vaccine safety FAQs, emails reveal.
Kansas legally charges Pfizer for misleading the public about its so-called "COVID-19 vaccine."
Courts set precedent for mass FORCED VACCINATION of all children.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.