For all the good work he has done in exposing vaccines and their dangers, Del Bigtree's ICAN Legislate organization is suddenly pushing them via a so-called "Vaccine Confidence Bill" that investigator Peggy Hall outed in a recent video – watch below.
After Hall uploaded the above video to YouTube, she "set off the firestorm," as she calls it, concerning this controversial new legislation that, for whatever reason, Bigtree's organization is promoting.
In Hall's view, the bill is "troubling" in that it looks like "a bait-and-switch maneuver" to trick the public, including Bigtree's supporters, into believing that it opposes vaccine mandates.
"I said you have to 'read between the lies' to see that in fact, the bill PROMOTES vaccine 'mandates' (hint: there is no such thing, as you always have a right of no consent to any medical intervention) rather that stopping them," Hall wrote in a piece posted to her Substack.
Be sure to read the bill in its entirety to see what Hall means.
(Related: Another focus of Hall's is geoengineering, which government documents show has been taking place for at least the past 50 years.)
No vaccine is ever truly required – you always have the right to JUST SAY NO to drugs
The stated purpose of the bill is to "increase vaccine confidence" by reassuring the public that an exemption exists "for required vaccines that do not meet certain minimal requirements." Said exemption "will increase confidence in mandated vaccines."
All throughout the bill, the phrase "increase public confidence in vaccines" is used that reading between the lines, as Hall says must be done, reveals to be a ploy aimed at boosting public confidence in mandated injections.
In order to do this, the department will publicize the fact that such an exemption exists, but only for required vaccines "that do not meet the minimal standards provided in this part," this coming straight from the document's text.
Hall takes issue with this premise right off the bat in that it promotes the idea that the public can have confidence in vaccines, or at least some of them. It also reinforces the false notion that any vaccine is "required," which is simply not the case.
"It also states that this would only be for those vaccines that do not meet the minimal standards," Hall further writes. "That means that certain vaccines would NOT allow for exemptions."
The document's text also states that the only time a person can be exempted from a vaccine requirement is if there is not already a vaccine available that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to meet certain criteria.
According to Hall, what the Bigtree organization's bill actually states is that there is no exemption from any "mandated vaccines" that have been shown to be "safe" after one year of study, among other factors.
"So, suddenly we now are supposed to trust the FDA?!?!?" Hall asks. "How could Del Bigtree be in favor of promoting this bill (which, 'thanks' to ICAN, has already been introduced into several state legislatures)?"
Hall directed her assistant to look into answering these questions and was told by Aaron Siri, the Bigtree organization's attorney, that he and his organization "don't have time to go into details."
"Are ANY of them to be trusted?" asked one of Hall's Substack readers. "I really don't think so. Why weren't they speaking out against vaccines all along? They had to know or should have questioned ALL vaccines."
More of the latest news about the deep state push to mass vaccinate everyone can be found at VaccineWars.com.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.