The plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against a California school district that mandated Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccination" achieved a victory this week after the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated its dismissal.
Filed by the Health Freedom Defense Fund, California Educators for Medical Freedom, and a number of other health freedom groups, the suit argues that the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) "interfered with [plaintiffs'] fundamental right to refuse medical treatment. In short, unless LAUSD employees agreed to get injected for COVID, they would "lose their jobs."
The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California had previously defended LAUSD's jab mandate based on the 1905 Supreme Court decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts to allow states to mandate smallpox vaccinations. The problem, according to Ninth Circuit Judge R. Nelson, is that smallpox injections, in that case, were deemed to help stop the spread of smallpox, which is not the case for COVID jabs.
In this case, plaintiffs "have plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively 'prevent the spread' of COVID-19," Judge Nelson wrote. "At this stage, we must accept Plaintiff's allegations that the vaccine does not prevent the spread of COVID-19 as true. And, because of this, Jacobson does not apply."
In other words, since there is zero compelling evidence to show that mRNA (modRNA) COVID shots prevent the spread of a virus called COVID, there is no legal basis by which to mandate them on anyone.
Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Use our decentralized, blockchain-based, uncensorable free speech platform at Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions.
(Related: Did you know that Tony Fauci still blames the unvaccinated for just about every COVID death that has ever occurred?)
mRNA injections aren't "traditional" vaccines – they're a medical experiment
Another argument successfully argued by plaintiffs is that mRNA injections do not even qualify as "vaccines" in the first place because they are a new technology. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) actually had to redefine what a "vaccine" is back in September 2021 from a product that "produce[s] immunity" to a "preparation" that supposedly "stimulate[s] the body's immune response."
"Their complaint's crux is that the COVID-19 'vaccine' is not a vaccine," Nelson said. "'Traditional' vaccines, Plaintiffs claim, should prevent transmission or provide immunity to those who get them. But the COVID-19 vaccine does neither."
This same admission was made by Janine Small, Pfizer's president of international developed markets, at a European Union (EU) hearing. Small explained that Pfizer never even bothered to test the ability of its mRNA injection to stop the spread of COVID, but pushed them through at warp speed regardless in order to keep up with "the speed of science."
What this all means, of course, is that former CDC director Rochelle Walensky point-blank lied to America, as did other "experts," when she falsely claimed that the vast majority of people who get "fully vaccinated" are protected from catching and spreading COVID.
President Biden said much the same when he mumbled on a few occasions about how people who get jabbed cannot spread COVID to others. These claims by Biden, Walensky and many others served as the basis by which injections mandates were pushed on the masses.
Then we have Tony Fauci who declared on numerous occasions that people who take the shots become "dead ends to the virus." Fauci would contradict himself on multiple occasions as well, but few people seemed to notice as the mandates continued.
Member of European Parliament Rob Roos commented on all these contradictory statements that it was "shocking" and "even criminal" for governments to play along with allowing vaccine mandates and "passports" when Pfizer itself had never even bothered to test the shots for efficacy.
COVID "vaccines" were a hoax from the very beginning. Find out more at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.