Putting Big Pharma on blast for this deception, Finley wrote that federal agencies are also to blame for taking "the unprecedented step of ordering vaccine makers to produce them and recommending them without data supporting their safety or efficacy."
Specifically, it was the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that colluded with vaccine corporations to push out false messaging about how bivalent "booster" shots will "improve your protection" against covid. This is patently false based on the data.
"You might have heard a radio advertisement warning that if you've had Covid, you could get it again and experience even worse symptoms," Finley wrote. "The message, sponsored by the Health and Human Services Department, claims that updated bivalent vaccines will improve your protection.
"This is deceptive advertising. But the public-health establishment's praise for the bivalent shots shouldn't come as a surprise." (Related: Both the European Union and the World Health Organization have also warned that covid boosters are dangerous.)
What we have all been told is that modifying messenger RNA injections to accommodate every new alleged "variant" and "subvariant" that comes along is as simple as just making a few simple tweaks. Then the tweakers who take said shots get their latest drug fix, helping them to avoid "covid."
None of this is true, not to mention the fact that it is dangerous. As Finley pointed out, there are three scientific problems with these false claims being made by Big Pharma and HHS:
1. The so-called "virus" is mutating at a much faster rate than the jabs can be tweaked.
2. The initial jab series already "hard wired" people's immune systems to respond to the original Wuhan strain, "so we churn out fewer antibodies that neutralize variants targeted by updated vaccines."
3. Antibody protection wanes after just a few months.
This and more was confirmed in two separate studies published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), which found that the latest boosters are not producing antibodies to the latest strains of covid.
The authors of these studies commented that this immune imprinting process "may pose a greater challenge than is currently appreciated for inducing robust immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants" – and this is amplified with each new booster.
Every person who took the initial injections for the Wuhan strain was subjected to retraining of their B-cells, which are responsible for producing antibodies. These people were "primed" by the initial shot series to respond just to that strain, and they "mounted an inferior antibody response to other variants," the studies confirmed.
These findings contradict the claims of Pfizer and Moderna, which claim that taking their new respective boosters will help boost protection against the latest variants and subvariants by 400-600 percent.
Finley says this is "misleading," which is a nicer way of saying that Pfizer and Moderna are lying just to generate more sales. This is all about profit, after all – and perhaps genocide, too – and has nothing to do with protecting people against any disease.
"The vaccine makers designed their studies to get the results they wanted," is how she put it. "Public-health authorities didn't raise an eyebrow, but why would they? They have a vested interest in promoting the bivalents."
It is shocking that the Journal even published Finley's op-ed since it is a direct affront to the prevailing narrative. Perhaps we have reached critical mass with this conversation and the tide is about to turn?
The latest news about injuries and deaths caused by covid shots can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include: