Americans who cling to the Democratic Party because they still believe it is an old-school liberal institution need to understand something: It isn't.
Today's Democratic Party has been taken over completely by a radical cabal of Marxists, Socialists and outright Communists, as evidenced by an institution they have long since absorbed, the 'mainstream media.'
Today's reporters and editors who work for legacy publications are nothing more than apparatchiks and propagandists who are disguised as journalists. Every angle they choose, every story they craft, every word they write and every TV news report they produce has but one purpose: To further the leftism by denigrating and destroying the remaining vestiges of our constitutional founding and traditional cultural mores and norms.
Case in point: The Austin American Statesman, which became a full-bore disinformation operation on behalf of this new Commie Democrat Party over the weekend when covering a mass shooting that left 13 people injured.
The mass shootings in big cities is nothing new of course; the more liberal and stupid they become, the more violent our cities have gotten. You can't ditch cash bail, refuse to prosecute certain crimes, and throw your police departments under the bus and not expect crime to rise -- especially violent crime. So the shooting in Austin isn't the focus here.
What the paper did is the focus.
"There was a mass shooting overnight in an entertainment district of Austin, Texas. 13 were injured. One suspect, described by police as a slim black male with dreadlocks, escaped the scene," investigative journalist Andy Ngo tweeted Saturday.
Catch that? The suspect is a black male, with dreadlocks, who opened fire at what appeared in the video to be a hip-hop concert.
Now, given those details, should we be surprised about that? Apparently so, according to the newspaper, which published this at the end of the story detailing nearly all of the incident:
Editor’s note: Police have only released a vague description of the suspected shooter as of Saturday morning. The Austin American-Statesman is not including the description as it is too vague at this time to be useful in identifying the shooter and such publication could be harmful in perpetuating stereotypes. If more detailed information is released, we will update our reporting.
Too vague? Seriously? The cops give the paper a description, which was based on some witnesses, and the editors decide it's "too vague" and will 'perpetuate' a 'stereotype?'
You know who continues to perpetuate stereotypes about young black men?
Young black men. Many of them wearing dreads, shooting up the place, committing random acts of violence.
In fact, it's safe to say that, based on FBI stats, young black males are the single most violent demographic in America. That's not the fault of 'white people.' It's not 'white supremacy.' It's a black culture problem.
Most of those perps grew up without a father. Many of them drop out of school. And nearly every young black male who makes something of himself is ridiculed at some point along the way by his peers, who accuse him of being an "Uncle Tom" or "actin' white."
This may be hard for many readers to see and comprehend, but let's face facts: This is all true. Whites, Hispanics, and Asians are not responsible for black culture. Black people are. And only black people can fix it.
Now, back to the Austin American Statesman. Newspaper editors and reporters are not supposed to pick and choose which facts they report. They are supposed to report all facts, and at the time this shooting story was published initially, editors had a description of the shooter. But they chose to ignore that, to deprive the public of very valuable information about a very dangerous person, because it's not about journalism anymore to these Marxist lunatics; it's about party preference, it's about pushing their ideology 24/7/365, it's about the 'fundamental transformation' of America. (And, it's racist because they would not have hesitated to 'perpetuate a stereotype' if the suspect was a white male.)
And if it looks like George Orwell's "1984," we shouldn't, as Americans, want any part of that.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.