Two years after the global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) back in 2003, the Special Pathogens Branch (SPB) of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a series of theoretical models and detailed in vitro findings about chloroquine (CQ), a relative of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) that was found to have a "prophylactic and therapeutic advantage" against coronaviruses. So why, then, are today's leftists so against this generic anti-malaria drug, which has the potential to help save people's lives?
The SPB's cell culture studies have been cited hundreds of times in the scientific literature, serving as a springboard for other research including a 2006 paper published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal identifying CQ as a "valuable therapeutic option if SARS re-emerges."
Later on in 2014, following the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak, research conducted by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), which was headed by the same Anthony Fauci that oversees this agency today, found that CQ and HCQ exhibit "activity against both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV."
Keep in mind that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) has been classified as SARS-CoV-2, meaning it is essentially a second-generation variety of the original SARS. In other words, there is no reason why CQ and/or HCQ would not be effective against it as well.
We already know from Dr. Stella Immanuel's testimony that HCQ combined with zinc and one of two antibiotics is effective in treating the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) at her clinic, as well as at medical facilities in other parts of the world where it is being used.
The way that CQ works – HCQ is simply a "benign analog" of CQ – at least according to the NIAID, is that it has the ability to "reconfigure" coronaviruses "into a less virulent subclinical infection." This means that HCQ effectively neuters coronaviruses, leading to their disease outcomes being less virulent.
Survey finds that most U.S. physicians would prescribe HCQ to their family members if they became infected
Earlier this year, a survey of U.S. physicians found that upwards of two-thirds of them, or around 65 percent, would prescribe HCQ to family members if they became infected with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). Roughly the same percentage indicated that they would also take the drug themselves if they became infected.
In another survey that included more than 6,000 physicians from the U.S. and other countries, 37 percent of respondents who had treated Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) patients indicated that HCQ was the "most effective therapy" they utilized.
Many heads of state are likewise in favor of using HCQ either for themselves or their families, including President Donald Trump, who recently indicated that he had taken a round of it preventatively.
According to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele, "most of the world's leaders" have been taking HCQ for prophylaxis purposes as they feel the need to do so. He also admitted that "sometimes what's recommended to the people is something different than what's recommended to the leaders."
Keep in mind that back in March, the U.S. was gifted millions of tablets of HCQ from drug giants Bayer and Sandoz, which donated them from the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had even granted emergency approval for the use of HCQ in addressing the plandemic.
But all of this changed more recently when the left decided to engage a witch hunt against HCQ, claiming that it does not work and is even dangerous. We know this is not the case when HCQ is used correctly, so what are these liberals who claim to want to "save lives" really up to in trying to deter the public against its use?
For more related news about the plandemic, be sure to check out Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.