Anti-white activists have basically been given free rein to turn Wikipedia into a BLM propaganda outlet, with numerous articles about "racism" and "police brutality" now blanketing the site's homepage.
Wikipedia is also now hosting blatant smear articles against President Trump, as well as articles that aim to indoctrinate white readers into feeling guilty over the color of their skin.
Almost immediately after the George Floyd incident, Wikipedia launched a "Black Lives Matter" WikiProject to address concepts like "racism in policing" and other "social justice" topics. This is similar to what Netflix did by launching a new "Black Lives Matter" entertainment genre to its streaming lineup.
One of the administrators governing Wikipedia's new BLM WikiProject is Guy Chapman, a far-left extremist who believes that "you can be one of three things: ally, enemy, or collaborator." In other words, if you are not a full-on supporter of BLM or someone who works to advance its agenda, then you are an enemy.
Chapman has kept busy over the past month changing Wikipedia articles about George Floyd, as well as about fellow domestic terrorist group Antifa. These changes, of course, aim to paint BLM and Antifa as the good guys, and those whom they oppose as the bad guys.
Amazingly, The Wikimedia Foundation, which owns Wikipedia, has fully endorsed BLM, stating that there is "no neutral stance" on racial justice.
This same dehumanizing ideology against the "other" is embraced by many other BLM administrators at Wikipedia, who are full-tilt in support of the group's violent, anti-white agenda.
Other mainstream media outlets are doing much the same thing by gaslighting Americans into believing that BLM and Antifa "protests" are merely "peaceful" demonstrations. More on this can be found in the following episode of The Health Ranger Report:
As for its edit-a-thon, Wikipedia says it is trying to improve "articles on topics relating to racism, racialized violence, and the African diaspora more widely." According to the site, this is to "counter Wikipedia's systemic bias," which it admits it has.
But this systemic bias apparently does not include biases against "alternative" health paradigms, for instance, which we have been covering for years. Those types of biases are a-okay at Wikipedia, which openly promotes Big Pharma while censoring natural remedies.
Wikipedia is also systemically biased against sources of information that question the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. According to Wikipedia, all vaccines are safe and effective, and anyone who says otherwise is a "quack" deserving of censorship in its articles.
Meanwhile, Wikipedia continues to bend over backwards to please the "cancel culture" mob and its violent demands for more race articles that promote blackness. Wikipedia is also flagrantly anti-Trump, having posted on its front page in the "Did You Know" section an article about Trump's tweet: "When the looting starts, the shooting starts."
Wikipedia of course cast the tweet in a racial context, accusing Trump of hating black people – this, despite the fact that many of the BLM and Antifa "protesters" appear to have white skin.
If you can even believe it, Wikipedia still claims to embrace a "neutrality" policy, despite all of this. Its articles, the site claims, are supposedly nonpartisan and fact-based, even though anyone with a functioning brain can see that Wikipedia is heavily slanted towards leftist viewpoints.
More news about the violence of BLM and Antifa is available at CivilWar.news.
Sources for this article include: