President Trump has been regularly lampooned and ridiculed by the garbage mainstream media and Democratic Party for claiming that he is the victim of an ongoing “coup attempt” by the deep state, which seeks to toss him out of office and reverse the 2016 election results.
But now, it’s been confirmed as real by none other than the lawyer for the so-called “Ukraine whistleblower” who is playing a role in the latest iteration of the coup attempt: Mark Zaid.
Who is he? A Leftist activist attorney with ties to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager John Podesta. And he’s the one who is representing Eric Ciaramella, the Democrat operative who has been identified as having worked for or associated with prominent members of Obama’s administration and current serving Democrat politicians.
In July 2017, Zaid — in response to a tweet from Virginia Barnett, wrote “we will get rid of” President Trump because “we have to.”
“Mark are we really going to be able to get him out? He is dismantling our government department by department. It is really scary,” Barnett wrote.
“It’s very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to,” Zaid responded.
Note that these lunatic Leftists always mention the president “and his supporters” because they hate the American citizens who put Trump in office as much as they hate him (and it’s us they will come for if they ever manage to “get rid of” Trump like they are trying to do).
Also, as The Gateway Pundit noted, Zaid admitted in other 2017 tweets that he was involved in orchestrating the coup attempt against the president. (Related: Adam Schiff’s subpoenas declared “legally invalid” by the DOJ… secret interrogations with selectively edited transcripts violate the rule of law.)
In addition, he ‘predicted’ that impeachment was indeed going to happen.
The deep state is following a script; those involved are simply following a script that they set in motion within days after Trump defeated the most criminally investigated presidential contender in our history, Hillary Clinton.
“#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers,” he wrote Jan. 30, 2017, in response to Trump’s firing of acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who refused to enforce and support a travel ban executive order the president issued.
This is sedition, plain and simple
Notice the date? Trump was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2017.
https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/826262311560216578
In response to a tweet from the president on the same day, Jan. 30, Zaid wrote, “#coup has started. As one falls, two more will take their place. #rebellion #impeachment.”
https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/826261939235979265
The Trump campaign on Thursday responded to all of this.
“The whistleblower’s lawyer gave away the game,” the Trump campaign’s communications director, Tim Murtaugh told Fox News. “It was always the Democrats’ plan to stage a coup and impeach President Trump and all they ever needed was the right scheme. They whiffed on Mueller so now they’ve settled on the perfectly fine Ukraine phone call. This proves this was orchestrated from the beginning.”
Mueller would, of course, be Robert Mueller, who was forced to admit in his report after an 18-month non-investigation of a non-crime that the president was not guilty of, or involved with, any “Russian collusion.”
This very frank admission that a coup attempt was launched against a duly elected president should chill every single American to the bone, regardless of which party they support. Because if one party can do this to the president of another party, what makes anyone believe the roles couldn’t be reversed the next time around?
Not everyone in America agreed with John F. Kennedy’s foreign and domestic policies. The deep state disagreed with his foreign policy so much they took him from us?
Is that what’s next for Trump? And what will Americans do if that were to happen?
We won’t remain a viable republic if we allow a group of men and women operating behind the scenes to reverse election outcomes, by force if necessary, simply because they don’t agree with our choice.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.