Radical Left at WAR with human biology: French schools replace “Mother” and “Father” with “Parent 1” and “Parent 2″… total idiocy now reigns supreme
02/21/2019 / By Ethan Huff / Comments
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
Radical Left at WAR with human biology: French schools replace “Mother” and “Father” with “Parent 1” and “Parent 2″… total idiocy now reigns supreme

The Cult of LGBT has reportedly achieved yet another major victory in perverting Western culture, this time in France where the French National Assembly recently voted to pass an education “reform” bill that completely does away with the words “mother” and “father,” and replaces them with the generic terminology like “Parent 1” and “Parent 2” to describe the alleged “modern” family unit.

Championed by the same political party of French President Emmanuel Macron, the new “gender neutral” terminology will be soon implemented on all official, school-related paperwork. Under the new provisions, all three-year-old children will also be forced to attend the very same schools that are making these draconian changes.

“This amendment aims to root in law children’s family diversity in administrative forms submitted in school,” stated REM (Macron’s political party) minister Valérie Petit. “We have families who find themselves faced with tick boxes stuck in rather old-fashioned social and family models. For us, this article is a measurement of social equality.

For more news about the destruction of Western culture at the hands of the Cult of LGBT, be sure to check out Gender.news.

Both conservatives AND LIBERALS throughout France are outraged by the new rules

According to reports, not everyone is pleased with the changes. Both conservatives and liberals alike say that eliminating the words “mother” and “father” from the lexicon of education will seriously undermine French families and societies at large.


Though his basis for opposing the changes is largely twisted, Alexandre Urwicz, president of the AFDH, a French association for same-sex parents, says “mother” and “father” should remain because terminology like “Parent 1” and “Parent 2” create a damaging situation in which “parental hierarchy” is promulgated.

“Who is ‘parent number 1’ and who is ‘parent number 2?'” Urwicz is quoted as asking, further making the suggestion that it’s best to just stick with “father, mother, and legal representative” on all educational forms.

95% of modern French families still have traditional fathers and mothers

Claims by advocates of the changes that they simply aim to “keep up with the times” are also bunk, seeing as how 95 percent of both marriages and civil unions in modern France are between one man and one woman.

“When I hear people say this is an old-fashioned model, I would remind people that today among unions celebrated, civil or marital, some 95 per cent are man-woman couples,” explained conservative member of parliament Xavier Breton in a statement.

Echoing his sentiments is fellow conservative MP Fabien Di Filippo, who’s quoted as saying that eliminating “father” and “mother” represents a “frightening ideology.”

Should they regain power in the future, these and other conservative leaders in France have promised to do everything in their power to repeal the power – including Laurent Wauquiez, leader of the opposition Republicans party, who vowed to lead this charge.

“Our citizens do not share anything with the political class, nor the policies they are imposing,” Wauquiez is quoted as saying, adding that using terms like “Parent 1” and “Parent 2” is “absolutely dehumanizing.”

“Children need guidance,” he added in a statement. “This amendment goes towards the disappearance of fundamental references.”

Similar gender-neutral perversion is creeping its way into the United States as well, with some college campuses like Princeton University implementing policies that forbid students and faculty from using words like “man,” “woman,” “he,” and “her” to describe other people.

“Redefining what it means to identify and speak to specific genders is not a rational exercise because it requires us to ignore reality and surrender to authoritarianism – neither of which is good for a constitutional republic,” our own J.D. Heyes commented in response to this news.

Sources for this article include:



Submit a correction >>

Get Our Free Email Newsletter
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
Your privacy is protected. Subscription confirmation required.

Get the world's best independent media newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.

By continuing to browse our site you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.