Since Nov. 9, 2016, the day after the presidential election, Democrats have accused POTUS Donald Trump and his campaign of conspiring with Russia to “steal the election” from Hillary Clinton.
We’ve learned since then that the only conspiring with Russian sources that took place during the campaign was between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee, Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele, and Russian sources.
The Democrat-aligned Deep State has also accused Moscow of “meddling” in our 2016 election, but now, according to an assessment by a noted expert, a U.S. technology company — Google — very likely “meddled” in the 2018 election in a way that greatly benefited Democratic candidates and could even have led to Republicans losing control of the House.
As reported by The Gateway Pundit, research psychologist Robert Epstein has previously revealed that Google can change a 50-50 split among undecided voters to a 90-10 split without anyone realizing they had been manipulated, and without making it apparent to outside observers, based on a set of search suggestions that can be implanted into algorithms.
On Thursday during an appearance on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson program, Epstein made another startling revelation: A single shift in Google search results on Election Day 2018 very likely shifted anywhere from 800,000 to 4.6 million votes to Democratic candidates.
His revelations come in the heels of a blockbuster expose from Breitbart News, which revealed leaked contents of internal discussion threads at Google indicating that the company is manipulating search results after placing certain search terms like “abortion” and “Maxine Waters” on so-called “blacklists.”
Not only does Google control what users see, the manipulated search results also control what users don’t see. “Abortion” was one of the terms that Google engineers added to a “blacklist” file for “controversial YouTube queries,” where a list of search terms the company considers sensitive are housed.
In addition to the term abortion, additional terms “abortions,” “the Irish abortion referendum,” “Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters,” and anti-gun activist “David Hogg” were included, the internal leaked discussion thread revealed.
‘They can do whatever they want’
All of this criminal manipulation by Google, which is run by Leftists like the other major social media platforms, is having the desired effect, Epstein notes: Electing Democrats.
The researcher, who admits he’s “not a conservative” but rather an American citizen who is genuinely concerned about the outsized influence companies like Google can and have wielded in our elections, told Carlson that the search behemoth “can censor anything it wants to censor.”
Calling the leaks exposed by Breitbart “extraordinary,” Epstein said they confirm “what I and others have been saying in writing for years” that “individual employees at Google have the power to manually remove material, remove content that we see, and they do so often with political ends.” (Related: 2018 will be remembered as the year of tech censorship: Only delusional liberals still try to deny the attacks on free speech.)
Also, he continued, “this tells us that [Google CEO] Sundar Pichai committed perjury when he testified before Congress a few weeks ago because he said quite specifically that Google never does this.”
Carlson then asked Epstein if any American could trust that the next national elections in 2020 wouldn’t be interfered with or unduly influenced by Google and other tech companies and social media platforms including Facebook and Twitter.
“I guarantee you that this past election was affected,” Epstein said, adding that he has research data he will be releasing — perhaps by early March — substantiating his claim. He said Google’s posted reminder to “go vote” on Election Day in November shifted perhaps millions of votes to Democrats.
“Democracy is kind of an illusion at this point because we have let these companies — Google more than any other — go completely wild,” said Epstein. “There are no rules, no regulations, no laws that restrict anything they do.”
Read more about social media manipulation and deception at Deception.news.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.