Google has declared war on the independent media and has begun blocking emails from NaturalNews from getting to our readers. We recommend GoodGopher.com as a free, uncensored email receiving service, or ProtonMail.com as a free, encrypted email send and receive service.
09/04/2017 / By JD Heyes
By 2025, it’s possible that the last vestiges of privacy that still remain — and there aren’t many — will have been completely eradicated.
That’s because by that time, defense contractors who currently manufacture unmanned aerial vehicles — drones — for the military hope to be selling them to police departments, which will use them to replace helicopter crews and provide city-wide surveillance 24/7/365.
As reported by Defense One, one of the smaller drone manufacturers — General Atomics — has already demonstrated its Reaper for the Federal Aviation Administration, flying the company’s MQ-9B from Yuma, Arizona, to Grey Butte, Calif., the company’s headquarters, a distance of 275 miles.
The defense news website reported further:
There’s a reason big drones like the General Atomics Reaper aren’t already flying over the United States. The federal rules that govern aircraft in U.S. airspace are much stricter than those that cover U.S. military drones overseas. Many of the Federal Aviation Authority’s regulations were drafted for manned aircraft, long before unmanned flight across the United States was even a possibility.
However, the FAA is now working with private sector consultants to update the agency’s regulations to cover unmanned drone flight; once they are in place, the doors will be open for drone makers to sell to police departments.
“Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, they all have irons in the fire. But I don’t know that any of them are pushing as hard as General Atomics, or as early on the civil commercial side,” said Matthew Scassero, director of the University of Maryland Unmanned Aircraft Systems Test Site, told Defense One.
Currently, the U.S. military and some federal agencies have special permission to fly UAVs beyond line of sight of the operator. In fact, the Department of Homeland Security has been using drones to patrol the U.S./Mexico border.
That said, Natural News reported in June 2013 that a study found the drones did nothing to improve border security, but purchasing them certainly did “boost the bottom line of defense contractors.”
Natural News noted further:
Called Drones Over the Homeland, the report notes that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency — which falls under the gargantuan Department of Homeland Security — is set to gain even more drones under a $443.1 million contract the agency issued in 2012.
The report’s lead author, Tom Berry, told the Huffington Post at the time that researchers found use of the massive drones “an inefficient, costly and absurd approach to border security and homeland security…”
In addition, Berry worried about the privacy implications of law enforcement drone use.
“I think we should be afraid, in terms of this breaking down the distinction between domestic law enforcement and national security and foreign affairs,” he said. “That line has been crisscrossed many times with DHS.”
Others are also concerned about the hit to privacy widespread drone use by police will likely create. (Related: These Six U.S. Airports Are Scanning Your Face When You Leave The Country.)
“There is a lot of potential for privacy abuse if a surveillance device can identify a human at five kilometers away,” Julia Horwitz, the group’s consumer protection counsel, told The Washington Post in September 2014, in response to the U.S. Army’s plans to put cameras on a “blimp” it was planning to launch over Maryland. The Army eventually relented; the blimp eventually broke loose and caused havoc across multiple states before it was finally brought under control.
“Drones make indiscriminate and persistent aerial surveillance feasible and can easily be equipped with technologies like facial recognition. Without proper restrictions, drone surveillance will become the norm of public space, undermine our constitutional rights and chill First Amendment activities,” Jeramie D. Scott, head of the Domestic Surveillance Project at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), told Defense One. He added that while some local governments have implemented rules restricting the use of drones by police, there are no similar federal regulations.
Nevertheless, such privacy concerns are likely to take a back seat, given the capabilities envisioned for the next generation of UAV’s designed for use by police departments.
J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.
COPYRIGHT © 2017 NEWSTARGET.COM
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
Receive Our Free Email Newsletter
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
Once you click subscribe, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free subscription.