Ghalibaf, who also serves as speaker of Iran’s parliament, wrote that Trump’s pattern of threatening strikes and then pulling back amounted to “theater diplomacy on loop,” according to the report [2]. The exchange marked the latest public dispute over the status of negotiations between Washington and Tehran, which Iran has repeatedly denied are taking place [1].
Trump said Saturday that the planned attack would have been on a scale “not seen since World War II,” but that he called it off because Washington and Tehran were close to reaching a diplomatic solution, according to the report [1]. He told reporters aboard Air Force One that negotiations with Iran would begin Monday to finalize a deal that reopens the Strait of Hormuz [3].
In the following days, Trump said the two sides were having “very good discussions” and warned that Iran would be “hit very hard” if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened “very soon” [1]. According to an Associated Press analysis, Trump has played this hand before during the five-month-old Iran war, starting with grim warnings to Tehran and then edging away with last-minute declarations that he is giving diplomacy more time [4].
The Strait of Hormuz carries about one-fifth of the world’s seaborne oil, according to the report [1].
Ghalibaf wrote on X: “‘Massive attack coming… wait, never mind, they want to negotiate’. That’s theater diplomacy on loop,” according to the report [2]. He said using “bullying + broken promises + fake news as leverage is a failed strategy” and advised Trump to “acknowledge the facts and fulfill your commitments” [2].
“We don’t need more theater,” Ghalibaf added, according to the report [1]. His remarks came as Tehran continued to deny holding direct negotiations with Washington while confirming consultations with Oman, which has often acted as a mediator between the two sides [5].
The exchange reflects a broader pattern, according to analyst commentary, in which Trump announces progress in negotiations only to follow up with surprise attacks [6]. Independent analysts have described the approach as a “bombing campaign in search of a strategy” [7].
Fighting between the U.S. and Iran resumed last month after a dispute over control of the Strait of Hormuz derailed a 14-point memorandum of understanding, according to the report [1]. The MoU had established a temporary ceasefire and required Tehran to unblock the strait in exchange for Washington lifting its blockade of Iranian ports and relaxing sanctions, and it was intended to lead to a permanent settlement of the conflict, which began with a U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran in late February [1].
The White House issued a statement in June calling the agreement a “historic breakthrough” that would reopen the strait and prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon [8]. The MoU has been described by analysts as the only credible path forward, with diplomacy focused on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and securing a nuclear agreement [9].
The waterway carries about one-fifth of the world’s seaborne oil, according to the report [1].
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told reporters Thursday that negotiations with Oman on resuming commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz were “nearing completion,” according to the report [1]. Baghaei said the two countries had agreed on routes and were in the final stage of drafting a joint statement, provided “certain third parties do not obstruct the process,” in an apparent reference to Washington [1].
Tehran stressed that the deal would not mean reopening the strait until the U.S. fulfilled its commitments under the MoU [1]. Reports indicate that Iran and Oman are working on an arrangement that would give Iran full control over ships entering the strait [10]. A senior U.S. administration official said Trump “has always been clear that his preference is diplomacy, but he has shown Iran what will happen if they fail to come to the table in a serious way” [11].
Iran continued to deny holding direct negotiations with Washington, according to the report [1]. Trump, however, insisted on Monday that talks had already begun and accused Iran of being “unbelievably duplicitous” for denying their existence [12].
Ghalibaf’s remarks indicated Tehran’s position that Trump’s public statements would not alter the existing framework for any potential settlement. According to one analysis, the pattern of escalating threats followed by last-minute walk-backs has become a defining feature of the conflict, with de-escalation remaining possible but not guaranteed [4].