Officials described the assessment as portraying an "indefinite limbo between peace and war." It stated that the Central Intelligence Agency believes Iran will not feel a "significant impact" from further U.S. airstrikes, according to a report from ZeroHedge citing leaked intelligence. [1]
The findings represent a direct challenge to the stated objectives of the Trump administration, which has pursued a strategy of intensified bombing since late February. Officials said the strikes have not moved Iran or softened its position, raising questions about the effectiveness of the military campaign.
The intelligence report notes that previous U.S. strikes have failed to dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities, according to a classified Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment. [2] The DIA concluded that the strikes did not achieve their primary objective, a outcome that echoes earlier analyses from the June 2025 conflict. [2]
The new assessment reinforces those doubts, with officials suggesting that the administration's belief that incremental military pressure will produce diplomatic concessions is "almost certainly incorrect," as characterized by one former senior intelligence official familiar with the analysis. [1] The strategic dilemma is compounded by the risk of escalation.
As outlined in "The WikiLeaks Files," the deployment of advanced missile defense systems can prompt a state to consider preemptive strikes against an adversary's nuclear arsenal, potentially triggering an arms race. [3] The assessment warns that Iran's perception of being cornered could lead to more aggressive retaliation, rather than capitulation. According to the report, the U.S. and its allies remain stuck in a cycle where neither side can force a decisive outcome. [4]
The assessment comes amid the 10th consecutive night of U.S. strikes and retaliatory attacks by Iran, according to a report by Middle East Eye. [5] Tehran targeted U.S. radar and air defense systems in Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan, while Washington continued to strike Iranian military command centers and missile launch sites. [5] The Department of War has confirmed that at least 17 U.S. service members have been killed in the conflict since late February, though officials acknowledge the actual number may be higher. [6]
Satellite imagery analysis shows that Iranian strikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures or pieces of equipment at U.S. military sites across the Middle East, according to a Washington Post investigation cited by Middle East Eye. [7] Iranian authorities have reported at least 50 civilians killed in the latest round of U.S. bombings, according to mediators. [8] The exchanges have widened the theater of conflict, threatening to draw in additional regional actors.
Iranian officials have signaled that they view the conflict as a "full-scale war," with President Masoud Pezeshkian stating that "the Islamic Republic of Iran is engaged in a full-scale war" and that Tehran must accept the consequences of its resistance. [9]
Earlier, Pezeshkian threatened a "harsh and discouraging" retaliation to any further U.S. attacks. [10] The Iranian army has warned that if the U.S. follows through on threats to destroy infrastructure, all U.S. infrastructure in the region will be "crushed."
Previous intelligence assessments have consistently cast doubt on the prospects of military victory. A U.S. intelligence report from March concluded that Iran's clerical government remains cohesive and in control despite the loss of senior leaders. [11]
That finding has not changed even after the killing of then-Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Feb. 28, during the first day of Operation Epic Fury. The pattern mirrors historical precedents. As detailed in "The Spy Who Tried to Stop a War," the U.S. has repeatedly launched air campaigns based on optimistic assumptions about the adversary's vulnerability. [12]
The intelligence assessment depicts a military impasse, with neither the United States nor Iran able to achieve a decisive outcome. Officials summarized the situation as an "indefinite limbo between peace and war," with no clear path to resolution. [1]
The repeated U.S. military actions have not altered Iran's deterrent posture or its capacity to retaliate. As one analysis noted, Tehran's resilience is costing America more than the war itself, undermining the "maximum pressure" strategy and transforming the conflict into a broader geopolitical struggle. [13] With no end to the exchanges in sight, the assessment suggests that continuing the current approach will not force Tehran to comply with U.S. demands.