- Israel's cabinet approved a plan to register West Bank land as Israeli state property.
- This restarts a land title process frozen since Israel's 1967 occupation.
- Palestinians face a high burden to prove ownership, risking a massive land grab.
- Palestinian leadership and regional powers condemned the move as illegal annexation.
- The step systematically changes facts on the ground, challenging international consensus.
A dramatic shift in the decades-old status of the occupied West Bank is now underway as the Israeli government has taken a definitive step toward cementing its control over the territory. In a move that has ignited immediate Palestinian condemnation and is sure to draw fierce international criticism, Israel's security cabinet approved a proposal to begin registering large areas of the West Bank as Israeli "state property." This marks the first time such a process has been initiated since Israel's occupation of the land began in 1967.
The proposal was advanced by hardline nationalist ministers Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, Justice Minister Yariv Levin, and Defense Minister Israel Katz. They hailed the cabinet's decision as a transformative moment. Smotrich called it a continuation of "the settlement revolution to control all our lands," while Levin framed it as an expression of the government's commitment "to strengthening its grip on all its parts." Katz stated the move was "a vital security and governance move aimed at ensuring Israel’s control, enforcement, and full operational freedom in the area."
A bureaucratic path to control
The mechanics of the decision are technical, but its implications are vast. It restarts a "settlement of land title" process frozen for over half a century. When Israel begins registration in a specific area, anyone claiming ownership must come forward with documents to prove it. Given that the West Bank has been under military occupation for 57 years, the burden of proof is overwhelmingly high for Palestinian residents. Many lack decades-old deeds due to war, displacement, or the simple fact that land was often communally managed rather than formally registered.
Israeli anti-settlement group Peace Now warned this likely amounts to a "mega land grab." Hagit Ofran, director of the group's Settlement Watch programme, told the Associated Press that "Palestinians will be sent to prove ownership in a way that they will never be able to do." She estimated the process could allow Israel to take control of up to 83 percent of Area C, which constitutes about half of the entire West Bank and is under full Israeli military control.
Immediate backlash
The reaction from Palestinian leadership was swift and severe. The Palestinian Presidency condemned the decision as a "grave escalation and a flagrant violation of international law," calling it a "de facto annexation." They stated it "effectively voids multiple signed agreements and openly contradicts UN Security Council resolutions." Hamas also denounced the move as "null and void," calling it an attempt "to steal and Judaise lands."
The decision places Israel in direct confrontation with a broad international consensus. The United Nations, the International Court of Justice, and numerous human rights organizations maintain that transferring an occupying power's civilian population into occupied territory is illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention. Regional powers including Jordan, Qatar, Egypt, and Turkiye issued strong condemnations, with Jordan calling it a "flagrant violation."
This cabinet vote builds on another contentious measure approved just days earlier, which made it easier for Jewish settlers to purchase land in the West Bank. Together, these actions represent the most significant consolidation of Israeli control over the territory in years. Smotrich himself labeled it one of the most important steps taken since the Six-Day War, aimed at "restoring order and governance."
The historical context is critical. Since the 1967 war, successive Israeli governments have permitted and often encouraged the construction of settlements for Israeli civilians in the West Bank, which the international community universally considers illegal. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in these settlements. This new policy moves beyond building houses on disputed land to formally asserting state ownership over the land itself through a bureaucratic process.
A test for allies
The move presents a fresh challenge for Israel's chief ally, the United States. While President Donald Trump has publicly ruled out Israeli annexation of the West Bank, his administration has not acted to restrain accelerated settlement building. The U.S. had not issued an immediate comment on this latest decision.
What unfolds next is a slow-motion transformation of the landscape. The registration process could begin this year, systematically transferring vast swathes of territory from a contested status to formal Israeli state land. This creates a legal framework for unprecedented settlement expansion, fundamentally altering the map upon which any future peace agreement would be drawn.
For anyone observing the Middle East, this is not merely a policy adjustment. It is the operational implementation of a long-discussed political vision, one that treats the West Bank not as occupied territory subject to negotiation, but as a permanent part of Israel. The consequences will be measured in years of heightened conflict, deepened alienation, and a fading hope for a negotiated two-state solution. The ground is literally being prepared for a new, more entrenched reality.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.