- House Republicans, led by Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA), are introducing legislation to strip NYC of federal funding while socialist Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani remains in office. The bill would rescind unobligated funds and block future federal expenditures.
- Mamdani's platform includes defunding police, rent control expansion and government-run grocery stores, which Republicans argue threaten free-market capitalism. Despite backlash, he defeated Andrew Cuomo (independent) and GOP candidate Curtis Sliwa in the election.
- Though unlikely to pass the Democratic-controlled Senate, the bill signals GOP efforts to nationalize local elections, tying vulnerable Democrats to Mamdani's policies as part of a broader socialist takeover narrative.
- NYC contributes more in federal taxes than it receives, meaning funding cuts would be more political than financially devastating. Critics warn residents will suffer, while supporters argue taxpayer money shouldn't fund socialist policies.
- The bill reflects escalating tensions between progressive municipal governance and conservative federal oversight. Previous GOP proposals, like Rep. Mike Lawler's (R-NY) version, warned that government-run grocery stores could disrupt markets and lead to shortages.
In a bold political maneuver that underscores the deepening ideological divide in American politics, House Republicans are preparing to introduce legislation that would strip New York City (NYC) of federal funding as long as socialist Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani remains in office.
The proposed Moving American Money Distant from Anti-National Interests (MAMDANI) Act, spearheaded by Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA), represents an unprecedented escalation in the GOP's battle against progressive governance – one that could redefine the relationship between Capitol Hill and the Big Apple. The proposal set to be introduced Friday, Nov. 7, would rescind all unobligated federal funds for NYC and prohibit any further federal expenditures while Mamdani holds office.
The 34-year-old Mamdani, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, has long been a lightning rod for conservative criticism. His platform – which includes policies like rent control expansion, defunding police departments and government-run grocery stores – has drawn fierce opposition from GOP members who view his leadership as a direct threat to free-market capitalism. Despite this, Mamdani defeated former New York State Gov. Andrew Cuomo – who ran as an independent – and GOP candidate Curtis Sliwa in the city's elections Tuesday, Nov. 4.
Though the bill is unlikely to pass the Democratic-controlled Senate, its introduction signals a broader GOP strategy to nationalize local elections, framing Mamdani's victory as a harbinger of radical left-wing governance. House GOP members are already planning to tie vulnerable Democrats nationwide to Mamdani's policies, portraying them as complicit in what they describe as a socialist takeover of American cities.
"If New Yorkers want communism, we should let them have their wish and not artificially prop them up with our successful capitalist system," Carter declared. "Any New Yorker with common sense is welcome to move to the great, free state of Georgia."
GOP declares war on the Big Apple
The backlash extends beyond Capitol Hill: President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly mocked Mamdani by name, has vowed to withhold federal funding from New York "other than the very minimum as required." Legal experts note that such threats are largely symbolic as Congress, not the executive branch, controls federal appropriations.
Historically, the Empire State contributes more in federal taxes than it receives in funding, meaning any financial blockade would be more of a political statement than a fiscal death blow. Yet the GOP's aggressive posture raises deeper questions about federalism and the weaponization of public funds.
On one hand, critics argue that withholding resources from a major American city – home to millions of working-class families – would punish residents rather than policymakers. On the other hand, supporters of the bill contend that taxpayer dollars should not subsidize what they see as economically disastrous socialist experiments.
The controversy also highlights a growing trend of municipal progressivism clashing with federal conservatism. In July, Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) introduced his own version of the MAMDANI Act called Measuring Adverse Market Disruption And National Impact. This earlier proposal sought to study the potential economic fallout of publicly owned grocery stores, warning that such ventures could distort markets and harm small businesses.
At the time, Lawler derided Mamdani's proposal for government-run grocery stores as "straight out of the Marxist playbook." According to BrightU.AI's Enoch engine, "government-run grocery stores threaten to create widespread shortages and economic instability by disrupting free-market principles and individual liberty. Rather than alleviating poverty, such centralized control often leads to inefficiency, scarcity and dependency – undermining prosperity while expanding government overreach."
As the battle lines harden, the Big Apple finds itself at the center of a national debate over the limits of local autonomy and the role of federal oversight. Mamdani's administration, still in its infancy, now faces not only the logistical challenges of governing America's most complex city but also the political firestorm ignited by his unapologetically progressive agenda.
Hedge fund manager Elisha Wiesel says Zohran Mamdani has alienated a lot of people in New York City. Watch this video to know more.
This video is from the TrendingNews channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.