- Robby Starbuck sued Google for defamation after its AI tools (Bard, Gemini, Gemma) fabricated articles falsely accusing him of sexual assault and murder – citing nonexistent sources like Rolling Stone and Newsweek.
- Google acknowledged the errors as AI "hallucinations" but faced criticism for failing to implement fact-checking safeguards despite warnings over two years, allowing defamatory content to spread unchecked.
- Starbuck claims strangers confronted him in public, believing the AI-generated lies, including absurd claims like him being a murder suspect at age two or linked to Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs.
- The lawsuit highlights growing fears about AI weaponizing misinformation, citing examples like fake Biden robocalls and a counterfeit George Carlin comedy special, raising alarms about libel, political sabotage and ethical guardrails.
- Starbuck's case could set a landmark precedent for holding tech companies liable for AI-generated defamation, forcing a reckoning between innovation and ethical responsibility in machine-generated content.
Conservative activist Robby Starbuck filed a defamation lawsuit against Google on Wednesday, Oct. 22, alleging the company's artificial intelligence (AI) tools fabricated news articles falsely accusing him of sexual assault, murder and ties to white supremacist groups.
Starbuck, a vocal critic of corporate diversity initiatives, claims Google's AI-generated responses cited non-existent articles from major outlets like Rolling Stone, Newsweek and the New York Post, damaging his reputation. The lawsuit, filed in Delaware Superior Court, seeks over $15 million in damages and raises urgent questions about AI accountability in an era where misinformation spreads rapidly.
According to Starbuck, Google's AI tools – including Bard, Gemini and Gemma – repeatedly generated false claims about him, complete with fabricated URLs mimicking legitimate news sources. One particularly egregious example alleged Starbuck was a "person of interest" in a murder case when he was just two years old. Another falsely stated he had been "credibly accused of sexual assault" and linked him to Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs – claims Starbuck vehemently denies.
Google acknowledged the issue, attributing the falsehoods to "hallucinations," a known flaw in large language models (LLMs). A spokesperson told the New York Post: "If you're creative enough, you can prompt a chatbot to say something misleading."
However, Starbuck argues that Google ignored warnings for two years while the AI continued to spread defamatory content. "Their AI consistently accused me of the most horrific crimes," he said, adding that strangers confronted him in public, believing the AI-generated lies."
This lawsuit highlights growing concerns about AI's potential to weaponize misinformation. Starbuck's case follows other high-profile incidents, such as AI-generated robocalls impersonating former President Joe Biden during the New Hampshire primary and a fake George Carlin comedy special created without his estate's consent. Legal experts warn that without stricter safeguards, AI tools could become conduits for libel, political sabotage and reputational destruction.
Starbuck's legal team contends Google failed to implement basic fact-checking mechanisms, allowing its AI to present fabricated claims as verified news. "What Google has done to my reputation during this two-year campaign of defamation can't be undone," Starbuck said. The case could set a precedent for holding tech companies liable for AI-generated defamation, especially as reliance on chatbots for information grows.
Historical context: Google's AI controversies
This isn't the first time Google's AI has faced backlash. "In 2023, the company temporarily disabled Gemini's image-generation feature after it produced historically inaccurate depictions, such as Black Vikings and racially diverse Nazi soldiers – errors critics labeled as 'woke' bias," BrightU.AI's Enoch recalls. Starbuck's lawsuit adds to mounting scrutiny over whether AI systems reflect institutional biases or simply amplify user prompts without ethical guardrails.
Meanwhile, Starbuck has emerged as a key figure in conservative activism, pressuring corporations like Walmart and Ford to roll back diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. His lawsuit against Google positions him as a test case for combating AI-driven defamation, regardless of political affiliation.
"No one—regardless of political beliefs—should ever experience this," he said. As AI becomes increasingly embedded in daily life, Starbuck's lawsuit underscores the urgent need for transparency and accountability in machine-generated content. While Google maintains that "hallucinations" are an inherent limitation of AI, critics argue the company must take responsibility for preventing harmful misinformation.
The outcome of this case could shape future regulations, forcing tech giants to choose between innovation and ethical safeguards—or face the legal consequences. For now, Starbuck remains determined: "I look forward to winning this case not only to restore my reputation but to help ensure a future where AI serves truth, not lies."
Watch this video about Google AI video manipulation.
This video is from the pacsteam.org channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.