• The U.K. government has introduced a tool to map vulnerable groups (based on age, disability and care status) to provide "targeted support" during crises. Critics warn it risks privacy violations and overreach.
• The tool is part of a broader effort to address gaps exposed by the COVID-19 Inquiry, including the largest national pandemic exercise in a decade, involving 4,000+ emergency workers.
• Critics, like healthcare entrepreneur Jonathan Engler, cite past harms to vulnerable groups (e.g., restrictive 2020 measures) and fear the tool could enable similar outcomes under the guise of "support."
• The tool aligns with the Declaration’s "focused protection" approach but raises concerns about balancing targeted aid with autonomy and privacy.
• The government faces demands to clarify how "targeted support" will work, ensure accountability and avoid marginalizing groups, especially with a 2025 emergency alert test looming.

In a move that has sparked both praise and concern, the U.K. government has announced the creation of a Risk Vulnerability Tool designed to map and identify vulnerable groups across the country. This tool, developed by the Cabinet Office in collaboration with the Office for National Statistics, is part of a broader national pandemic response exercise scheduled for this fall. While the government claims it is a measure to provide "targeted support" during future crises, critics argue that such measures could undermine personal privacy and freedom of choice.

A nation on high alert

The announcement follows the U.K. COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 1 report, which highlighted significant gaps in the country's preparedness for the pandemic. The government has pledged to learn from these mistakes and is rolling out a series of measures to enhance resilience and response capabilities.

Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, The Rt Hon. Pat McFadden MP, said, "We must learn lessons from the COVID pandemic as we cannot afford to make the same mistakes again. However, we will plan in a way that recognizes the next crisis may not be the same as the last. We agree with the Inquiry that more needs to be done, and we are announcing measures to make sure that we are as prepared as possible for future pandemics."

One of these measures is the largest national pandemic response exercise in nearly a decade, set to involve over 4,000 resilience and emergency workers trained through the U.K. Resilience Academy. The exercise will test the country's capabilities, plans, protocols and procedures in the event of another major pandemic, with participation from all government departments, local resilience forums and devolved governments.

A bold but controversial step

The Risk Vulnerability Tool is perhaps the most controversial aspect of the government's new pandemic preparedness strategy. The tool creates a detailed map of the U.K., identifying vulnerable groups based on data including age, disability and whether an individual is receiving care. The stated aim is to improve the government's understanding of where disproportionately impacted groups are located ahead of and during crises, enabling targeted local support where needed.

However, this tool has raised significant privacy concerns. Jonathan Engler, a British healthcare entrepreneur, noted, "What sort of support will these targeted people receive? There’s plenty of evidence that 'vulnerable' individuals were subjected to protocols which ended their lives prematurely, with such deaths being classified as 'COVID deaths.'"

This concern is not unfounded. During the 2020 pandemic, there were instances where vulnerable groups were subjected to measures that some argue shortened their lives. Engler points to testimonies from the Scottish COVID Inquiry, which have been widely shared on platforms like Biologyphenom’s Substack, highlighting the harrowing experiences of many individuals.

Historical context and modern implications

The idea of "targeted support" is not new. It is a central tenet of the Great Barrington Declaration, a document advocating for "focussed protection" to manage pandemics without widespread lockdowns. Engler, who has written extensively on the topic, urges readers to revisit this document, which he describes as "an essential read for anyone interested in understanding the nuances of pandemic management."

However, the implementation of such ideas in a government tool raises significant ethical and practical concerns. The Great Barrington Declaration emphasizes the importance of protecting the most vulnerable while minimizing the economic and social impacts of broad restrictions. The Risk Vulnerability Tool, while aiming to achieve similar goals, may inadvertently overstep the boundaries of personal privacy and autonomy.

A call for transparency and accountability

As the U.K. prepares for its largest pandemic response exercise, the need for transparency and accountability has never been greater. The government must clearly define what "targeted support" entails and ensure that it does not lead to the marginalization or harm of vulnerable groups. Engler emphasizes, "We must be vigilant to ensure that these tools are used to genuinely help those in need, not to impose unnecessary or harmful interventions."

The national test of the Emergency Alert System, scheduled for later in 2025, will also be a critical moment to assess the government's preparedness. With approximately 87 million devices in the U.K. set to receive a test message, the exercise will provide valuable operational insights and help identify any issues before an actual emergency.

Conclusion

The U.K. government's efforts to enhance pandemic preparedness are commendable, but they must be balanced with a commitment to protecting personal privacy and freedom of choice. As we move forward, it is essential to engage in open dialogue and ensure that the lessons learned from the past are applied in a way that truly serves the best interests of all citizens.

The Risk Vulnerability Tool and the upcoming national pandemic response exercise are significant steps, but they must be implemented with care and transparency. The future of our resilience and preparedness depends on it.

Sources include:

TheExpose.com

Wired-gov.net