It is now considered an act of "domestic terrorism" for at least half of America to merely protest, a categorization that simply would not have been possible apart from the "Patriot Act" and all the social engineering that came along with it. Nearly two decades later, what appears to have been the true intent of this "law" is coming into view: to destroy those who wish to live in a sovereign republic rather than a globalist democracy.
In order to maintain a "safe" and "secure" society, we are told that civil liberties and the Bill of Rights have to go. Allowing them could lead to another "insurrection," after all, and that would just be scary. Consequently, Washington, D.C., had to be turned into what now looks like North Korea, and the Democrat-led legislature is crafting a Patriot Act 2.0 to prevent any future attempt at "violence" against the political oligarchy.
"This is all driven by a radical expansion of the meaning of 'incitement to violence,'" writes Glenn Greenwald. "It is accompanied by viral-on-social-media pleas that one work with the FBI to turn in one's fellow citizens (See Something, Say Something!) and demands for a new system of domestic surveillance."
Should anyone dare to speak out against this authoritarian encroachment, the stage has already been set to label him or her a "sympathizer" of "terrorists" and "neo-Nazis," along with the ever-dreaded "white supremacists." This categorization alone is enough to scare the average American into silence, even if at the conscience level it becomes obvious that this is an affront to all Americans, regardless of political views.
The deep state is openly admitting that the first War on Terror laid the groundwork for this second one. Its aim is to purge all "extremists," meaning anyone who refuses communism, from society. This is what the Capitol false flag attack was all about: crystallizing public perception in opposition to the idea of patriotism, which is now akin to terrorism.
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who for years headed the Joint Special Operations Command in Iraq as well as commanded the war in Afghanistan, compared domestic patriots to radicalized "Arab youth" during a recent interview with Yahoo News. The two videos below illustrate how what is now being said by liberals and neoconservative hacks about what they think should be done to stop future "insurrections" by conservatives is essentially the same rhetoric that was used back in 2002 to justify the passage of the Patriot Act:
Considering that the United States already imprisons more of its citizens than does any other country in the world, it is both perplexing and disturbing that nearly every major news outlet, along with the consortium of Big Tech platforms, are calling for even more laws that would criminalize behavior deemed as "domestic terrorism."
"Why would such new terrorism laws be needed in a country that already imprisons more of its citizens than any other country in the world as the result of a very aggressive set of criminal laws? What acts should be criminalized by new “domestic terrorism” laws that are not already deemed criminal?" asks Greenwald.
"They never say, almost certainly because – just as was true of the first set of new War on Terror laws – their real aim is to criminalize that which should not be criminalized: speech, association, protests, opposition to the new ruling coalition."
By effectively stirring a critical mass of America into fever-pitched fear and panic over "insurrectionists," the media and its allies are using a tried-and-true method of imposing more tyranny on the masses by pretending to protect them against some new boogeyman that, like many others from the past, does not actually exist.
Greenwald warns that the alarmism and fear-mongering is being used to redefine what it even means to "incite violence." It is also what is being used by corrupt members of Congress to whine and scream about prosecuting on "sedition" charges their colleagues who objected to the illegitimate Electoral Certification process.
During the first War on Terror, many American Muslims bore the brunt of this same rhetorical assault. Simply due to their religion and skin color, many of them faced new forms of prosecution under draconian "anti-terrorism" laws that went above and beyond what the Constitution would have normally allowed. Now, the same thing is on the verge of happening to American patriots and conservatives who object to things like fraudulent elections.
Put simply, the goal with all the current theatrics is to convince enough Americans that mere free speech "incites violence" in order to ban it. Left, right or otherwise, every American who cares about the Constitution should be chilled to the bone by this, and wholeheartedly object to it.
"If you identify as a conservative and continue to believe that your prime enemies are ordinary leftists, or you identify as a leftist and believe your prime enemies are Republican citizens, you will fall perfectly into the trap set for you," Greenwald warns about the false left-right paradigm.
"Namely, you will ignore your real enemies, the ones who actually wield power at your expense: ruling class elites, who really do not care about 'right v. left' and most definitely do not care about 'Republican v. Democrat' – as evidenced by the fact that they fund both parties – but instead care only about one thing: stability, or preservation of the prevailing neoliberal order."
Greenwald's full analysis is available at this link.
More related news about the deep state push to criminalize all forms of dissent that do not go along with the transition to global communism can be found at Tyranny.news.
Sources for this article include: