Google has declared war on the independent media and has begun blocking emails from NaturalNews from getting to our readers. We recommend GoodGopher.com as a free, uncensored email receiving service, or ProtonMail.com as a free, encrypted email send and receive service.
01/14/2020 / By Ethan Huff
The very same “medical journal” that infamously retracted Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s autism study for supposedly being “flawed” has more recently decided to publish a ridiculous new paper that claims “eliminat[ing] whiteness” is the only way to solve the societal “problem” of racism.
This book review published by The Lancet asserts that “white Americans continue to mobilise to maintain or extend the exclusive advantages whiteness offers those who can become white” – a gobbledygook string of virtue-signaling nonsense that implies whiteness is something a person can “become” in order to gain “exclusive advantages” afforded only to people with white skin.
Though there’s not a shred of evidence anywhere in the world to support this dastardly notion, The Lancet apparently thinks it’s “scientific” enough to publish, once again proving that The Lancet is the National Enquirer of “science” journals.
Written by Rhea W. Boyd, a “Minority Health Fellow” at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, this review is in reference to a 2019 book entitled, Dying of Whiteness, written by Jonathan Metzl, the thesis of which contends that “right-wing backlash policies have mortal consequences – even for the white voters they promise to help.”
A professor of Sociology and Medicine, Health, and Society at Vanderbilt University, Metzl, a white-looking male, attempts to make the argument that white people are self-sabotaging themselves by supporting President Donald Trump and his policies, which Metzl believes are centered around “racial resentment” and the desire among whites to “maintain an imagined place atop a racial hierarchy.”
“From expansive gun legislation to broad divestment in government programmes, Metzl characterizes white liberties that endanger white lives or imperil white futures as ‘dying of whiteness,'” reads Boyd’s assessment of Metzl’s viewpoints as published in The Lancet.
While Boyd, a black life who works at Harvard’s “Office of Diversity and Inclusion,” agrees with Metzl’s anti-white racism, she’s of the persuasion that it doesn’t go far enough in condemning white people for having white skin.
Even as white people afflicted by the anti-white racism of loud-and-proud racists like Metzl and Boyd turn to prescription drugs or even suicide as coping mechanisms, Boyd, who epitomizes the “angry black female” meme, believes that this is simply not enough abuse to completely stamp out the whiteness she hates.
Suicide, chronic liver disease, drug and alcohol poisoning and other so-called “diseases of despair” should instead be called “diseases of disproportionate opportunity (to wield firearms) and access (to prescription opiates),” Boyd contends.
Hilariously, Boyd further suggests that black people are better than white people because they supposedly support “policies that benefit everyone while whites only support policies that benefit themselves.”
Somehow, the hordes of welfare queens who occupy most major cities in America are looking out for everyone by living off the teat of the nanny state, which is mostly funded with white taxpayer dollars. But the evil whiteys who support small government and lower taxes for everyone are only looking out for other evil whiteys, in Boyd’s view.
So, the solution, Boyd says, is “to eliminate whiteness altogether,” which we can only assume means that she would like to see the mass genocide of white people in order to create “equality” for all of the poor black lives out there whose every plight and misfortune is a product of “white supremacy.”
“The fact that some people think this way is frightening enough,” writes Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D., for Breitbart News.
“That the Lancet, which once represented serious medical journalism, would decide to publish it points to a devastating deterioration of the institutional academy as reasoned discourse gives way to incoherent ranting.”
Sources for this article include:
COPYRIGHT © 2017 NEWSTARGET.COM
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
Receive Our Free Email Newsletter
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
Once you click subscribe, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free subscription.