Our nation recently acknowledged the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) towers, with millions reiterating the infamous "never again!" trope that was popularized during the Bush administration. But what still isn't being acknowledged by presumably most Americans is the fact that the FBI has yet to come clean about its cover-up of the real truth surrounding 9/11, including the controlled demolition of WTC 7, also known as "Building Seven."
While the mainstream media continues to claim that the two towers – and Building Seven, which they rarely even mention – collapsed into their own footprint due to "fires," the fact remains that this is certifiably impossible. Steel structures don't just fall to the ground from flames, as fire isn't hot enough to melt them – and even if they could, they wouldn't cause entire buildings to basically disintegrate straight down into the ground.
If you're at all familiar with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (A&E for 9/11 Truth), this group of architects and engineers has thoroughly debunked the official 9/11 tale as it's been told to the world. It also recently announced the release of a draft report on a four-year study it conducted with the help of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, revealing what actually brought down Building Seven.
Before the full study is released, A&E for 9/11 Truth is asking for the public to comment on its initial draft release. After this two-month comment window has ended, A&E for 9/11 Truth will publish the study in its entirety, which includes three different approaches for examining what it describes as the "structural response" of Building Seven to the conditions "that may have occurred on September 11, 2001."
"First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred," the study's authors announced about their methodologies. "Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)."
"Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed," they added.
For more related news about the deception surrounding 9/11, be sure to check out FalseFlag.news.
How much does the FBI know about what really took down the World Trade Center structures?
As for the FBI's role in perpetuating the false narrative that Building Seven collapsed simply due to fire, several members of A&E for 9/11 Truth, as well as the Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and several victim family members of those who were killed during the terror attack, have filed a joint lawsuit against the federal agency, requesting further assessment of the evidence.
The FBI would appear to be harboring evidence about what really destroyed Building Seven, as well as the two main towers, that it has yet to publicly release. This would suggest that the FBI is fully complicit in the cover-up, which is hardly a surprise seeing as how this same agency covered up the crimes of Hillary Clinton, and later the crimes of Comey himself.
"According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission's and the FBI's compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress," reports The Free Thought Project.
You can learn more about the ongoing work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in exposing the truth about one of the world's great tragedies at the group's website.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.